v6.1 · released 3 October 2026
Human in the lead, not just in the loop.
Give your agents a sprint. They report back for your approval.
SDLC Studio runs your coding agent as a lean Scrum team. You approve a one-sentence goal. It builds each unit test-first, has each one reviewed by an agent that did not write it, and hands you one page to sign. Every run feeds the next.
Get startedHow the factory works
- v6.1.0
- Supported by Anthropic through Claude for Open Source. Sponsorship, not endorsement.
You
Agree
You approve the goal and the plan once, and that approval opens the run; after that it does not stop to ask.
sprint.py plan --write01 / Plan
Checks each unit is scoped and sized, orders the batch against the agreed goal, and forecasts what it will cost.
sprint.py plan02 / Build
Builds each unit test-first and runs its acceptance criteria.
verify_ac.py run03 / Review
One reviewer who did not write the unit judges it, in at most two rounds.
critic.py brief04 / Close
Closes the run in one pass and files a one-page report of what shipped and what did not.
sprint.py close05 / Learn
Turns what went wrong into failure classes the next plan and briefs carry.
retro.py extract
Return belt Learn back to Plan
You
Sign
You read one page and sign it once, which moves each unit to Done or Fixed; the sign command refuses anyone who wrote or reviewed a unit.
sprint.py signOne install, every agent
The installer puts the same skill where each of these reads its skills.
- Claude Code
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- opencode
- GitHub Copilot
- Cursor
What runs by itself, and what is yours
Planning runs by itself; approving the plan is yours. Between that approval and your signature, every step runs unattended, and each names the command that does it, so you can read it or run it yourself.
What makes the loop
One sprint goal
in 6.0A goal of 20 words or fewer, traced to an outcome or a persona, approved once with the plan.
One independent reviewer
in 6.0Each unit is judged by one reviewer who did not write it, briefed by the shipped tool, in at most two rounds; a unit still rejected at the cap is carried as a bug.
The close in one pass
in 6.0The close runs every step once and files a one-page report that states each known issue rather than being withheld over one.
One signature
in 6.0You sign the run once, after reading the report; a principal who authored or reviewed a unit in it is refused.
Stopping a run
in 6.0A run can be stopped; while a unit is unanswered the stop is refused unless forced, and a forced stop names each unit it waived.
Who answers the questions
A run raises questions. A question in a seat's lens is ruled by that seat, citing the rulings before it. A question only you can answer sets its unit aside, and the run puts all of them to you at once.
The release run, RPT0011, had 0 questions ruled by a seat and 8 ruled by the operator. The line runs by itself between your two touchpoints; it does not run without you.
| Run | By a seat | By the operator |
|---|---|---|
| RPT0006 | 4 | 0 |
| RPT0007 | 2 | 0 |
| RPT0008 | 3 | 0 |
| RPT0009 | 4 | 0 |
| RPT0010 | 2 | 0 |
| RPT0011 | 0 | 8 |
Persona rulings
in 6.0A question in a seat's lens is ruled by that seat, citing any earlier ruling on the subject, so the run does not wait for you.
Your questions, asked together
in 6.0A question only you can answer sets its unit aside without halting the batch, and every such question is put to you at once.
How it learns
Each plan re-measures the cost per point from the newest runs, and the learn step records what went wrong as a failure class, whose rule the next plan and every review brief carry.
The last three runs each spent about half of what was forecast, so the forecast now tends to run high; you can set the rate by hand. A class being recorded is not proof it stops recurring: a class that repeats twice is filed as a change request to fix its failing path.
| Run | Spent against forecast |
|---|---|
| RPT0006 | 1.14x |
| RPT0007 | 0.5x |
| RPT0008 | 1.03x |
| RPT0009 | 0.51x |
| RPT0010 | 0.53x |
| RPT0011 | 0.5x |
A forecast that follows the newest runs
in 6.0The cost per point is re-measured from the newest runs at every plan, and you can set it by hand.
Failure classes
in 6.0What went wrong in a run is recorded as a failure class, and its rule is carried into the next plan and each review brief.
A repeating class graduates
in 6.0A class that repeats twice after it was recorded files one change request to fix its failing path, and reads graduating.
A class that has graduated
in 6.1Once the change request a graduating class filed ships, the close marks the class graduated, with no hand edit; a class whose request was rejected is retired instead, so a later repeat revives it.
Measured runs
The six v6 runs, each closed by the tool and signed by the operator. Hours are wall-clock, so waiting counts; the token ratio is tokens spent against the forecast.
RPT0006Judged achieved
A sprint runs start to finish on its own, learns from itself, and hands you one page.
- Points
- 58
- Hours open
- 8.7h
- Token ratio
- 1.14x
RPT0007Judged partial
Commits clear in about a minute, and the sprint learns from repeated mistakes without being told.
- Points
- 42
- Hours open
- 5.4h
- Token ratio
- 0.5x
RPT0008Judged partial
A commit clears in ninety seconds, and every commit lane left standing shows what it caught.
- Points
- 32
- Hours open
- 7.2h
- Token ratio
- 1.03x
RPT0009Judged partial
Maya's units are reviewed once against their files' history, and the review paperwork nobody reads is deleted.
- Points
- 111
- Hours open
- 7.0h
- Token ratio
- 0.51x
RPT0010Judged achieved
Maya runs the lean loop on a fresh v6 project, and the release candidate ships.
- Points
- 102
- Hours open
- 27.3h
- Token ratio
- 0.53x
RPT0011Judged achieved
v6.0.0 ships: Maya and Jonah install, upgrade and learn it from docs and notes that match the code.
- Points
- 131
- Hours open
- 29.5h
- Token ratio
- 0.5x
The v5 baseline
v5 review, 23 September 2026
A v5-era run stood open for 14.5 to 59.6 hours. Of the last 116 v5 sprint units, 82% built or repaired the sprint, review and gate machinery rather than the product. The token forecast missed by 4.07x on geometric mean.
The evals
On the candidate and the release
Eval 09, a lean sprint: Pass, for one fresh agent working from the docs alone, its plan pre-approved.
Eval 06, the independence gate: Fail on the release candidate, then 11 of 11 behaviours on the final skill.
Shipped open
Known issues at 6.1.0
2 defects ship open, each listed by id with its severity. Read the known issues.
Start on code you already have
Point it at a repository that has never seen SDLC Studio. Nothing needs setting up first, and nothing is written to your code. If the findings are not worth having, stop there.
/sdlc-studio audit --profile repo- Hunts
- Architecture, code quality and defensive security.
- Checks
- Each candidate goes to a panel briefed to refute it.
- Files
- Only the survivors, as bugs and change requests with their own ids.
- Security
- Remediation only: where it is, the weakness, its realistic impact and a concrete fix, with no proof-of-concept payload. A committed secret is reported by where it is, with the value left in place.
Sponsor
Supported by Anthropic through Claude for Open Source. Sponsorship, not endorsement.
Install
One command, pinned to v6.1.0. It checks the download against the release's published checksum before unpacking it, and refuses when that checksum is missing or does not match.
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/DarrenBenson/sdlc-studio/main/install.sh \
| SDLC_STUDIO_REQUIRE_CHECKSUM=1 bash -s -- --version v6.1.0Coming from 6.0? Install, then run the same two migrate steps in each project. What 6.1 retires.
Coming from v5? Install, then run migrate in each project for a dry run, and migrate --apply to carry it across. What v6 removes and keeps.
# a dry run: what it would change
/sdlc-studio migrate
# carry the project across
/sdlc-studio migrate --apply